INKRAH Law · Pengadilan Niaga · Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004

Article 303 — Jurisdiction Despite an Arbitration Clause

Android (Chrome/Edge): tap the ⋮ menu, then “Install app” or “Add to Home screen”.
iPhone/iPad (Safari): tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
Windows/Mac (Chrome/Edge): click the install icon in the address bar, or the ⋮ menu, then “Install INKRAH”.
Firefox/Samsung Internet: open the menu, then “Add to Home screen”, or save a bookmark.

Disclaimer: INKRAH Law reproduces the text of legislation for information and educational purposes only, and covers solely statutes made by the legislative and executive branches. The text may contain typographical or translation errors; always verify its authenticity and official version at the JDIH (official legal-documentation portal) of the relevant executive or legislative institution. To confirm whether a regulation is still in force, please visit the relevant institution's official website, and take note of any judicial review granted by the Supreme Court (MA) or the Constitutional Court (MK). English and other foreign translations here are unofficial.
Official source / JDIH →

Bahasa Indonesia

Pengadilan Niaga tetap berwenang memeriksa dan menyelesaikan permohonan pernyataan pailit dari para pihak yang terikat perjanjian yang memuat klausula arbitrase, sepanjang utang yang menjadi dasar permohonan pernyataan pailit telah memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (1).

English (British)

The Commercial Court remains competent to examine and decide a bankruptcy petition between parties bound by an agreement containing an arbitration clause, insofar as the debt underlying the petition satisfies Article 2(1).